Please enable javascript, or click here to visit my ecommerce web site powered by Shopify.

Obituary For The American Church – Mike Breen

Guest Post by Mike Breen

From time to time I will have the people I’m discipling write out their own pastoral obituary. I ask them to write out how our enemy would take them out, rendering them unable to serve their family and communities. As you can imagine, the answers vary, but always serves as a really helpful exercise as they are forced to confront issues of character, etc.

Now last week I did a post looking at some of the things the American church is doing well. Today, let’s do something different. You see, taking the same exercise I’ve used with pastors, for the past year I’ve been thinking how the enemy would/might be trying to take down the American church. Now what I’ve noticed is that the original temptations Jesus faced (which can best be boiled down to Appetite, Affirmation and Ambition) are somehow warped and insinuated into the culture. As each culture is distinct and different, a smart enemy would come at each culture in subtle ways, tempting them in ways they don’t see or expect, and with things that would look different from culture to culture.

For instance, the issues the European church deal with are actually quite different than the ones the American church is dealing with – even though often times they are put under the same broad umbrella of “Western Church.” Sure, there are some similarities, but the attack is different. More nuanced.

But those original temptations of Appetite, Affirmation and Ambition are slowly insinuating themselves into everything we call CHURCH. We just often don’t recognize it or see it.

And so this is how, if our enemy gets his way, the American church could be taken out:

A culture of CELEBRITY (affirmation)

A culture of CONSUMERISM (appetite)

A culture of COMPETITION (ambition)

CELEBRITY

The idea of celebrity is deeply woven into American culture and values. All you have to do is look at the ridiculous nature of Reality TV and you see how Americans are constantly craving celebrity (either to be a celebrity or to find the next celebrity and stalk there every move). Now there is nothing dark or sinister about “celebrity” in and of itself. You can’t find an argument that says Jesus wasn’t a huge celebrity in his day.

However, there is a difference between being famous and being significant. If Jesus was famous, it’s because he was doing something significant. The problem with many pastors is they make decisions, develop personas and define success from the lens of what will make them a celebrity/famous (even if they don’t know it or see that they are doing this). So in American church culture, it’s pretty easy to become a celebrity: Grow a HUGE church. Now all in all, it’s not terribly difficult to grow to be a giant church if you have the right tools at your disposal – but that doesn’t mean the ends justify the means of getting there.

For instance, though Jesus was a celebrity in his day, he was willing to say things that ran people off in droves. In fact, the book of Mark chronicles the way (from about the mid-point of the book on) how people left Jesus to where, at the end, virtually no one was left. NO ONE wants to be associated with him for fear of the consequences. That’s a Charlie Sheen-esque flameout (obviously without the character issues!). That’s not something you see too often in American churches.

I suspect it’s because riven deeply into the American psyche is the desire to be a celebrity. And American pastors are very susceptible to this. Many subtle things happen in people who desire to this kind of celebrity status:

* They can disengage community and isolate themselves, setting themselves up for moral failure.

* They can make decisions that are numbers driven and not always Kingdom driven.

* They can skew to a shallow understanding of the Gospel as opposed to a holistic one that leads people to discipleship.

* They can put the good of their church (their personal Kingdom) over the good of God’s Kingdom.

Question: In what ways are your decisions made by a subtle undercurrent of ambition and a hope for celebrity?

CONSUMERISM

We live in a culture that revolves around consuming. Every TV commercial, every store, every credit card company, every bank, every TV show or movie, every piece of clothing, car or product, every website, every restaurant every everything is tailored to fit your desires, needs or personal preference. We are easily infuriated when things don’t happen exactly as we want them. We exist in a place that implicitly says this: “We are here to serve you and meet your every whim and desire. Let us take care of you.” What’s more, it’s never enough.

Eventually the house or the car get older and we want new ones. The clothes aren’t as fashionable and we want something more in style. That restaurant is getting boring, we must find another. Our favorite TV show is wearing thin, so the search begins for the next favorite. And on and on and on. This is how we are wired to think in the United States. And it is all backed up by this rationale: You’re worth it. You deserve to have what you want, how you want it, when you want it. And for the most part, the church plays the exact same game.

We do as best we can to provide as comfortable an experience as humanly possible, using every means at our disposal to attract them in (and then keep them in). So we tailor what we do around their wants and desires. That’s Marketing 101, right? The problem is at the end of the day, the only thing that Jesus is counting is disciples. That’s it. He doesn’t seem to care too much about converts, attendance, budgets or buildings. It’s about disciples. And, by nature, disciples are producers, not consumers.

Yet most of our churches are built around feeding consumers. I’d argue 90% of the church’s time, energy and resources are linked to this. But the issue is this: The means you use to attract people to you are usually the means you must use to keep them. In other words, if you use consumerism to attract them to your church, it often means you must continue using it to keep them or else they will find another church who will meet their “needs.” And yet, that consumer mentality is antithetical to the Gospel and to the call of Discipleship.

Disciples aren’t consumers, they are producers. Jesus cared about disciples more than anything else.

Question: In what ways is your church community using consumerism as the means to draw people to a Gospel that is, in and of itself, anti-consumerism?

COMPETITION

You will never find a more hyper-competitive culture than you do in the United States. As a foreigner living in this land, I can attest to that with the utmost respect. Americans love to win, they love the struggle of the journey and love holding up the gold medal of victory. Now don’t hear me wrong, there’s nothing wrong with being competitive, it’s just how competition has become warped and twisted within our culture. And it’s that, at least in the church, we are competitive about the wrong things.

Much of the American church finds itself competing with the church down the road. “Are we bigger than them? Do we have more influence than them? Do we have the best/biggest youth group in town? Do people like to get married in our church building? Do people like our church better than theirs?”

The fact of the matter is that there is a battle, we do have an enemy and we should be competitive – but against our enemy! What we haven’t seen is how crafty he is. This seems to be the alliance he has struck with the American church: “I’ll let a good chunk of your churches grow, just not at the expense of my territory.”

FREE eBook, Simple Ways To Be Missional, when you sign up for our FREE email updates. Enter your email address below to download your free eBook:

And so what happens? 96% of church growth is due to transfer growth and not churches striking into the heart of our enemy’s territory. We’ll consider it a win because we have the new service or program that is growing – but that growth is mainly from people coming from other churches. That’s not a win! That’s a staggering loss. Furthermore, for many pastors, we don’t think we’ve won until we’ve won AND someone else has lost. Seriously?! For sure, we have an enemy and we should be competitive, but we should be competing against our enemy, knowing that the final battle has already been won, and not competing against our own team members.

So gifted and skilled is our enemy, so conniving is he, that he has convinced us that beating the people on our own team is victory while he stands back and laughs, rarely having to ever engage in conflict, protecting his territory. He is beating us with a slight of hand, with a clever distraction, turning us against ourselves. Question: In what ways are you competing (both in actuality or simply in your mind) against people who are on your own team?

In all honesty, it isn’t that the American church will ever truly die or cease to exist. It will always be there. But it is entirely possible that if these three critical issues aren’t addressed and dealt with, it will be a hallow shell that is spiritually listless.

If we think through Celebrity, Consumerism and Competition, the anti-body against all of these is sacrifice. Learning to lay down what builds us up and giving to others instead. Learning to serve, rather than to be served. Looking for anonymity rather than celebrity. To build a culture of producers rather than a consumers. To live in a vibrant, sacrificial community fighting a real enemy rather than competing against the same community God has given us to fight WITH rather than AGAINST. It’s about sacrificing what we want for the glory of God and the advancement of his Kingdom, regardless of our advancement or desires.

Clearly this is what Paul was getting after in Philippians 2:6-11 when describing the attitude of Jesus as taking on the attitude of a servant, willing to sacrifice all acclaim and equality with God. It was a willingness to set aside and sacrifice celebrity, consumerism and competition at the altar of the incarnation.

Fifty years ago, as these three subtle threads were being woven into the American church, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., serving as a prophetic voice, said this:

If today’s church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authenticity, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twentieth century.

We are now into the second decade of the 21st century and we find ourselves still, for the most part, refusing to sacrifice what we want for what God is asking of us and his Church. Will we have the courage to sacrifice as Christ sacrificed? Will we do the things that cost us so that his Kingdom may advance?

About The Author

Mike Breen has been an innovator in leading missional churches throughout Europe and the United States for more than 25 years, and leads 3DM, a movement/organization that is helping hundreds of established churches and church planters move into this discipling and missional way of being the church.  Twitter: @mike_breen

email

  • http://twitter.com/jasonegly Jason Egly

    This is phenomenal. You have hit the nail on the head. These three things are KILLING our churches, especially here in the Bible Belt. They are all subtly related, and the root sin is pride. And we know for a fact that pride precedes a fall. Thankful for your prophetic words. Prayerful that many American church leaders will wake up and answer the call to sacrificial leadership.

  • Mike

    I’ve really enjoyed many of your posts.  I did want to point out one thing that seems out of place.  In the above article, at the end of your section on consumerism, there’s an ad of sorts.  It’s an offer of a “FREE” (emphasis with all caps) ebook.  The word free is repeated three times.  It almost felt that the wording of this add appeals to the consumerism that affects us. 

    Just wanted to point this out

  • Todd

    Every generation since Adam has had their “celebrity, consumerism, and competition” sin issues.  Maybe in different forms of character sin…but all generations have had it.   At Exponential we just completed a devotional study of 30 Bible Leaders (from Adam to Peter) through the lens of their personal stories of sifting (with sifiting defined as “worldly troubles intersecting with spiritual warfare to produce increased surrender to God”).  These daily devotionals (http://www.storiesofsifted.com) highlight that in every generation God uses messed up leaders to accomplish his purposes.  Trouble…sin…character issues…surrender.   Most pathways of following Jesus point to increased surrender.  God has his way of humbling his people to repentance and surrender.  Unfortunately, the notion of an obituary on the church may be a rallying cry for many, not because of a concern for the surrender of the leaders, but rather because of distaste for our current forms of church.  

  • Pingback: Obituary For The American Church – Mike Breen | Verge Network | churchgrowthissues.com

  • sam

    Living in Europe, what would the 3 issues of Europe be?

    • http://twitter.com/Mike_Breen Mike Breen

      I think the implications are different for different countries in Europe. In the UK I’d probably say it would be like this:
      Authority=Class system
      Ambition=Manipulation (think of Machiavelli’s “The Prince”)
      Appetite=Scarcity mentality (both economically and spiritually)

      • Josh

        Thanks for your article.  Above, you mention “authority=Class system.”  Can you elaborate on this more?  I ask because I do not believe there has ever been a system without classes… It seems that the church has thrived the most in such systems in history and at present (underground, perhaps).  Do you mean that the church became part of that system lock stock & alter?  I can see that.  You narrowed these terms down to the UK.  I agree, but think the church in the UK was more vibrant than the church on the continent.  There were more freedoms in the UK–so many “dissenting” sects that remain vibrant today.  –  Thanks for your thoughts!

  • Guest Responsder

    What is to “sacrifice”?  We should only be grateful for God’s relentless grace to us sinners and rejoice that he loves us so much.

  • http://www.facebook.com/steve.hollinghurst Steve Hollinghurst

    Mike – i can see that this is perhaps extra on the button the US side of the pond but think there is much in this back here in the UK – and i must confess that even some level of publicly recognized ministry – d list Christian celebrity ;o) – suddenly pushes all sorts of pressures in ones direction – the discipline of blessing others becomes very important. So i think central to what you explore here is leadership that is about taking the lower place that the body is built up and discipleship that is cross shaped – these are always important – and hard ;o) – but perhaps especially so when culture pushes so much in the opposite direction 

  • http://twitter.com/mahoneyrm5150 Ryan Mahoney

    Wow.  Fantastic piece; spot on; truly insightful.

  • Michael

    Consumerism is evident in the very way in which we perceive exactly who it is we are called to serve.  In the very beginning, this article opens with a challenge as to how one would be rendered “unable” to serve one’s “family and community”.  Where is the Lord in this equation?  I think, then, this is the underlying problem in all three categories; our “willingness” to serve the Lord first.  If we are looking to serve the Lord first and foremost, we are going to be no good to our families, our communities, or our churches.  Our willingness to serve the Lord first renders us able to serve all others.  

    I appreciate the article because it gets very close, but I perceive the problem to be even bigger.  We do not love the Lord first.  Sacrifice and repentance have been lost on us because, as one responder observed, “why the need for sacrifice?”  Indeed.  Question answered.

  • Michael

    Consumerism is evident in the very way in which we perceive exactly who it is we are called to serve.  In the very beginning, this article opens with a challenge as to how one would be rendered “unable” to serve one’s “family and community”.  Where is the Lord in this equation?  I think, then, this is the underlying problem in all three categories; our “willingness” to serve the Lord first.  If we are looking to serve the Lord first and foremost, we are going to be no good to our families, our communities, or our churches.  Our willingness to serve the Lord first renders us able to serve all others.  

    I appreciate the article because it gets very close, but I perceive the problem to be even bigger.  We do not love the Lord first.  Sacrifice and repentance have been lost on us because, as one responder observed, “why the need for sacrifice?”  Indeed.  Question answered.

  • Michael

    CORRECTION: “If we are NOT willing to serve the Lord first and foremost …”

  • Michael

    CORRECTION: “If we are NOT willing to serve the Lord first and foremost …”

  • http://www.CrazyAboutChurch.com/ Charles Specht

    Sadly, I couldn’t agree more.  The American church needs a 180-degree reformation.  And soon!

    PS: I absolutely love, love, love the picture used in this article. 

  • Lamar Carnes

    Scripture is always our marching order manual.  When the Holy Spirit came down on the existing ekklesia, a local body of believers in the area, they received POWER to witness Christ to the surrounding human beings in the area insomuch so, an individual named Peter preached “ONE” sermon and thousands of people were saved at once.  Now that is a “mega-church” if I have ever heard of one formed instantly without “outside” means other than a human being filled with the Holy Spirit and power by Him to witness Christ to those who heard the message.  So, I never have any fear at all about “numbers” being counted – they did in Acts – so are we somehow more spiritual and have greater revelations than the Apostles had who wrote the books of the Bible? 
       Certainly, if a person or group misuses “means” to get people to “a meeting” and “coerce them into making some type of a decision” we would know it is not following protocal at all Biblically speaking.  I would pray and support Holy Spirit word filled preaching and expect God to save many souls after such a message is preached. If He doesn’t He received glory anyway because the messsage is two-fold; either redemption or judicial hardening!  It always does what it was intended to do so says the Lord! 

       And may I say, the large group saved in the book of Acts were certainly discipled and taught the word and carried out many fuctions congregationally as taught by our Lord Jesus to the Apostles.

       All of the rhetoric given today trying to “make” things better because we see and observe many things out of order in traditional venues can mean we “tear” up some “means” which have been absued and not used properly.  We need to never throw out that which is meaningful, helpful, and can be of vital use in the kingdom, just because it is old or traditional.  New things may be “bad” or misused also.  We have to be careful all the time we follow scriptural mandates and the over all spiritual sense of bringing glory to God in our utilization of means and methods! 

    Let’s not become so “miopic” we begin to be like those we accuse of being off base in their approaches to serving God!  Becoming like those who are entrapped in “religion” can eventually produce another “religious” entrapment of pride and arrogance if not careful.

  • http://brandonacox.com Brandon A. Cox

    I’ve had a lot of conversations about this in the last few weeks, especially the celebrity culture. I think we have to be careful abou tour attitude toward “celebrity” Pastors. Not all of them chose it. For some, it was thrust upon them by a culture that is celebrity-crazed. Some handle it with the utmost integrity and others fall prey to pride. Heaven forbid, though, that we actually begin to believe all the fluffly stuff people say about us! Praise is one of life’s greatest tests of character.

  • Pingback: How would he take you out? « Eddiebonline's Blog

  • http://twitter.com/SusanThroop Susan Throop

    I think the 3 points you made clearly defines the problem.